ATP-5-0-2-1 Staff Reference Guide Volume 1 Download
Page 115 of 440
Planning 07 December 2020 ATP 5-0.2-1 99 Obstacles (natural and reinforcing). EAs. Enemy disposition, composition, disposition, and strength. Task, purpose, method, and end state. Key enemy weapon systems range fans. Avenues of approach. NAIs and TAIs. 2-300. The threat SITEMP is modified based on significant effects the operational environment may have on the threat COA. For example, the threat may prefer to establish battle positions 1 to 1.5 kilometers apart, but terrain may force the threat to increase this distance to protect its flanks (see figure 2-27 on page 100). 2-301. To construct a SITEMP, analysts can use the following process: Begin with the threat template developed as part of the threat model during Step 3 of the IPB process. Overlay the threat template on those products depicting operational environment effects on operations (typically, the MCOO, but this may vary depending on the operation and situation). Adjust the dispositions portrayed on the threat template to account for operational environment effects. Since many options are available, use judgement and knowledge of the threat's preferred tactics and doctrine as depicted in the threat model. Attempt to view the situation from the point of view of the threat commander when selecting from threat templates. Additionally, orient the map from the threat point of view. Consider the operational environment, including but not limited to terrain, weather, and civil considerations. Check the SITEMP. Account for all threat major assets, ensuring no inadvertent duplications. Ensure the template reflects the main effort identified for the COA. Compare depicted dispositions to the threat's known doctrine and check for consistency. Consider the threat's capability to present an ambiguous situation in order to achieve surprise. Include as much detail on the SITEMP as time and the situation warrant. For example, if the threat is defending. Identify likely engagement areas, reinforcing obstacle systems, and counterattack objectives that form part of the defensive COA. Depict the locations and activities of the HVTs listed in the threat model. Use the description of preferred tactics that accompanies the threat model as a guide. Think through the threat COA scheme of maneuver. Visualize how the threat may transition from its current positions to those depicted on the template. Mentally war-game the scheme of maneuver from positions depicted on the template through the COA's success or failure. Identify points where forces may transition from one formation to another. Identify how each threat characteristic fits in and supports the operation. Evaluate time and space factors to develop time phase lines depicting threat movement. Draw time phase lines on the template depicting the expected progress of attacking forces and movement of forces in the deep and support battle areas. Base time phase lines on the threat's doctrinal rates of movement, with some modification. Evaluate actual movement rates, as revealed in the database, with written doctrine. Consider operational environment effects on mobility. If contact with friendly forces is expected, mentally war-game the effects this may have on the threat's speed.