Honeywell International Inc
Dba Honeywell International
Div Aerospace Golden Valley
(Advanced Technology)
CAGE Code: 27327
NCAGE Code: 27327
Status: Active
Type: Manufacturer
Dun & Bradstreet (DUNS): 039380407
Summary
Honeywell International Inc, Dba Honeywell International, Div Aerospace Golden Valley, (Advanced Technology) is an Active Manufacturer with the Cage Code 27327 and is tracked by Dun & Bradstreet under DUNS Number 039380407..
Address
1985 Douglas Dr N
Minneapolis MN 55422-3935
United States
Points of Contact
No Points of Contact...
Related Information
People who viewed this 'CAGE Code' also viewed...
Gtc Service Parts Co Suburban Radiology Tonerecycle Inc. Premier Electrical Corp Aerolite Inc Engel J A Inc C J's Linen Service Non Commissioned Officers Club Chars Trench Lesage Inc Carlson Marketing Group Engineered Demolition Inc H T Electronic Laboratories Inc Os/2 Express Navarre Biomedical Ltd Johnson Larry L And Associates Inc Summit Medical Systems Inc Minnesota Absorption Corp Getchell Steel Treating Co Inc Fluidyne Engineering Corp Carlson Travel Group Inc Dba Carlson
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for CAGE 27327
- What is CAGE Code 27327?
- 27327 is the unique identifier used by NATO Organizations to reference the physical entity known as Honeywell International Inc Dba Honeywell International Div Aerospace Golden Valley (Advanced Technology) located at 1985 Douglas Dr N, Minneapolis MN 55422-3935, United States.
- Who is CAGE Code 27327?
- 27327 refers to Honeywell International Inc Dba Honeywell International Div Aerospace Golden Valley (Advanced Technology) located at 1985 Douglas Dr N, Minneapolis MN 55422-3935, United States.
- Where is CAGE Code 27327 Located?
- CAGE Code 27327 is located in Minneapolis, MN, USA.
- How Many NSNs Does CAGE Code 27327 Supply?
- CAGE Code 27327 has been assigned as an approved source for 62 NSNs (National Stock Numbers and NATO Stock Numbers).
Contracting History for CAGE 27327 Most Recent 25 Records
- 75D30123P17235
- Cc8486219-M-Us
- 15 Sep 2023
- Cc8486219-M-Us
- Cdc Office Of Acquisition Services
- Department Of Health And Human Services (Hhs)
- $94,053.00
- Department Of Health And Human Services (Hhs)
- W912CG20C0018
- Mod To Change Pop
- 22 Apr 2021
- Mod To Change Pop
- W6qk Acc Ccdc Sttc
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $1,159,225.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W912CG20C0018
- New Darpa Baa Proposal Titled, "Fuel Cell Power For Long Endurance Suas
- 23 Mar 2023
- New Darpa Baa Proposal Titled, "Fuel Cell Power For Long Endurance Suas
- Dcma Twin Cities
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $1,159,225.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W912CG20C0018
- Bilateral Modification For Added Effort Under Clin 0004
- 24 Jun 2021
- Bilateral Modification For Added Effort Under Clin 0004
- W6qk Acc Ccdc Sttc
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $1,159,225.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W912CG20C0018
- Darpa Baa "Fuel Cell Power For Long Endurance Suas" - Admin. Mod To Cancel Dcma Mod A00002
- 10 May 2023
- Darpa Baa "Fuel Cell Power For Long Endurance Suas" - Admin. Mod To Cancel Dcma Mod A00002
- W6qk Acc Ccdc Sttc
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $1,159,225.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W911S718P0087
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade
- 26 Jul 2023
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade
- W6qm Micc-Ft Leonard Wood
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $363,405.65
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W911S718P0087
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade
- 4 Aug 2022
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade
- W6qm Micc-Ft Leonard Wood
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $363,405.65
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- W911S718P0087
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade Option 3
- 28 Jun 2021
- Honeywell Ebi Upgrade Option 3
- W6qm Micc-Ft Leonard Wood
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $348,341.88
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- NNL15AC08T
- Task Order Entitled "Spatial Disorientation Mitigation: Existing And New Methods". In December 2014, As A Result Of Analyzing 18 Loss-Of-Control Events, The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) Recommended Research Into Flight Deck Technologies That Have Potential To Mitigate The Problems And Contributing Factors That Lead To Flight Crew Loss Of Airplane State Awareness (Asa) And Conditions Likely To Produce Spatial Disorientation. The Aviation Community (Government, Industry And Academia) Have Been Charged With Conducting Research In The Following Areas: 1. Assess The Relative Benefits Associated With Various Methods Of Displaying Angle-Of-Attack On The Flight Deck. 2. Develop And Refine Algorithms And Display Strategies To Provide Control Guidance For Recovery From Approach-To-Stall Or Stall. 3. Develop And Refine Systems That Predict The Future Aircraft Energy State And/Or Autoflight Configuration If The Current Course Of Action Is Continued And Provide Appropriate Ing. 4. Cost-Effective, User-Centered Flight Deck Ing Systems To Flight Crews Especially For The Two Conditions That Produced Spatial Disorientation In The Asa Event Data Set (Sub-Threshold Rolls And The Somatogravic Illusion). They Suggest This Research Should Raise The Technology Readiness Level (Trl) Of These Features To A Level That Enables Cost-Effective Implementation And Certification Of These Technologies. This Work Supports The Nasa Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Aosp), Air Traffic Management (Atm) Technology Demonstrations (Atd) Project, Technologies For Aircraft State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project In Support Of Cast's Safety Enhancement #207, Outcome #4.
- 10 Jul 2023
- Task Order Entitled "Spatial Disorientation Mitigation: Existing And New Methods". In December 2014, As A Result Of Analyzing 18 Loss-Of-Control Events, The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) Recommended Research Into Flight Deck Technologies That Have Potential To Mitigate The Problems And Contributing Factors That Lead To Flight Crew Loss Of Airplane State Awareness (Asa) And Conditions Likely To Produce Spatial Disorientation. The Aviation Community (Government, Industry And Academia) Have Been Charged With Conducting Research In The Following Areas: 1. Assess The Relative Benefits Associated With Various Methods Of Displaying Angle-Of-Attack On The Flight Deck. 2. Develop And Refine Algorithms And Display Strategies To Provide Control Guidance For Recovery From Approach-To-Stall Or Stall. 3. Develop And Refine Systems That Predict The Future Aircraft Energy State And/Or Autoflight Configuration If The Current Course Of Action Is Continued And Provide Appropriate Ing. 4. Cost-Effective, User-Centered Flight Deck Ing Systems To Flight Crews Especially For The Two Conditions That Produced Spatial Disorientation In The Asa Event Data Set (Sub-Threshold Rolls And The Somatogravic Illusion). They Suggest This Research Should Raise The Technology Readiness Level (Trl) Of These Features To A Level That Enables Cost-Effective Implementation And Certification Of These Technologies. This Work Supports The Nasa Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Aosp), Air Traffic Management (Atm) Technology Demonstrations (Atd) Project, Technologies For Aircraft State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project In Support Of Cast's Safety Enhancement #207, Outcome #4.
- Nasa Langley Research Center
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- $235,861.00
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- NNL08AD71T
- Flight Critical Systems Research (Fcsr) Task Order Statement Of Work (Sow) Task Order Title: Conflict Detection And Resolution For Nextgen Terminal Maneuvering Area Concepts, Issues, And Pilot Vehicle Interfaces Background: By 2025, U.S. Air Traffic Is Predicted To Increase 3-Fold, Yet The Current Air Traffic System May Not Be Able To Accommodate This Growth. In Response To This Challenge, A Consortium Of Industry, Academia And Government Agencies Have Proposed A Revolutionary New Concept For U.S. Aviation Operations, Termed The Next Generation Air Transportation System Or Nextgen. Emerging Nextgen Operational Concepts Represent A Radically Different Approach To Air Traffic Management And As A Result, A Dramatic Shift In The Tasks, Roles, And Responsibilities For The Flight Deck To Ensure A Safe, Sustainable Air Transportation System. To Support The Operational Goals Of Nextgen, Jpdo Has Published A Concept Of Operations (Conops) [Http://Www.Jpdo.Gov/Library/Nextgenconopsv12.Pdf] And An Integrated Work Plan [Http://Www.Jpdo.Gov/Iwp/Iwp_Version_02_Master_W-O_Appendix.Pdf] To Develop The Technologies That It Considers Vital To Reach The Nextgen Goals. While This Vision Is Not Necessarily Shared By All Nor Is It The Only Way To Achieve Nextgen, It Does Illustrate Many Of The Challenges To Achieving A Nextgen Operating Environment. In Particular, One Of The Key Challenges Associated With The Nextgen Involves Automated Surface Management Systems That Utilize Dynamic Algorithms To Calculate The Most Efficient Movement Of All Surface Traffic To Increase Efficiency. Pilots Will Be Required To Comply With 4-Dimensional (4-D) Taxi Clearances, Dictating That Aircraft Arrive At Specific Locations Within Specific Time Windows. Further, Pilots May Be Responsible For Separation From Other Aircraft During These Operations Regardless Of Visibility Conditions. Proactive Safety Layers Enable Present-Day Operations. These Layers Include Automation To Manage, Assist And Even, Conduct These Procedures And Operations. In Today S Operations, A Significant Layer Of Conflict Detection And Resolution (Cd&R) Capability Is Provided By The Traffic Alert And Collision Avoidance System (Tcas). Tcas Has Been Developed And Improved For Over 15 Years And Has Been Very Effective In Reducing Or Eliminating Airborne Collisions. Nextgen Operational Concepts Are Beginning To Emerge To Meet The Projected Air Traffic Service Demands. It Will Be Vital To Retain And Even Improve Upon These Proactive Safety Layers For Nextgen. Limited Research To Date Has Been Conducted On Concepts And Issues Associated With Cd&R In A Nextgen Environment, Particularly In The Terminal Maneuvering Area (Tma) And On The Surface. Research To Date Indicates That The Use Of Tcas May Work For Envisioned Trajectory-Based 4-D Operations, But The Suitability Of Tcas Degrades In Operations Nearing The Airport For Operational Concepts Like Those Most Likely To Emerge For Nextgen. Research For Cd&R In A 4-D Surface Operations Environment Is In Its Infancy. Another Important Consideration Is That The 4-D Terminal Area Operations Concepts Proposed For Nextgen Are Being Built Upon Present-Day Operations That Are Already Problematic. The National Transportation Safety Board Continues To Include Improving Runway Safety On Its Most Wanted List Of Transportation Safety Improvements For Aviation [Http://Ntsb.Gov/Recs/Mostwanted/Aviation_Issues.Htm]. In The Four Year Period Between 2003 And 2006, 1,306 Runway Incursion Events Were Reported, Which Is A Rate Of Almost 1 Runway Incursion Event Per Day. The Present-Day Statistics And Events Are Cause Enough For Alarm But, Without Proactive Counter-Measures, The Increase In Air Traffic Forecasted Under Nextgen And Using Novel 4-D Operating Concepts Could Potentially Result In Catastrophic Increases In Runway And Taxiway Incursion Accidents. Objective: The Objective Of This Task Is To Identify An
- 7 Mar 2019
- Flight Critical Systems Research (Fcsr) Task Order Statement Of Work (Sow) Task Order Title: Conflict Detection And Resolution For Nextgen Terminal Maneuvering Area Concepts, Issues, And Pilot Vehicle Interfaces Background: By 2025, U.S. Air Traffic Is Predicted To Increase 3-Fold, Yet The Current Air Traffic System May Not Be Able To Accommodate This Growth. In Response To This Challenge, A Consortium Of Industry, Academia And Government Agencies Have Proposed A Revolutionary New Concept For U.S. Aviation Operations, Termed The Next Generation Air Transportation System Or Nextgen. Emerging Nextgen Operational Concepts Represent A Radically Different Approach To Air Traffic Management And As A Result, A Dramatic Shift In The Tasks, Roles, And Responsibilities For The Flight Deck To Ensure A Safe, Sustainable Air Transportation System. To Support The Operational Goals Of Nextgen, Jpdo Has Published A Concept Of Operations (Conops) [Http://Www.Jpdo.Gov/Library/Nextgenconopsv12.Pdf] And An Integrated Work Plan [Http://Www.Jpdo.Gov/Iwp/Iwp_Version_02_Master_W-O_Appendix.Pdf] To Develop The Technologies That It Considers Vital To Reach The Nextgen Goals. While This Vision Is Not Necessarily Shared By All Nor Is It The Only Way To Achieve Nextgen, It Does Illustrate Many Of The Challenges To Achieving A Nextgen Operating Environment. In Particular, One Of The Key Challenges Associated With The Nextgen Involves Automated Surface Management Systems That Utilize Dynamic Algorithms To Calculate The Most Efficient Movement Of All Surface Traffic To Increase Efficiency. Pilots Will Be Required To Comply With 4-Dimensional (4-D) Taxi Clearances, Dictating That Aircraft Arrive At Specific Locations Within Specific Time Windows. Further, Pilots May Be Responsible For Separation From Other Aircraft During These Operations Regardless Of Visibility Conditions. Proactive Safety Layers Enable Present-Day Operations. These Layers Include Automation To Manage, Assist And Even, Conduct These Procedures And Operations. In Today S Operations, A Significant Layer Of Conflict Detection And Resolution (Cd&R) Capability Is Provided By The Traffic Alert And Collision Avoidance System (Tcas). Tcas Has Been Developed And Improved For Over 15 Years And Has Been Very Effective In Reducing Or Eliminating Airborne Collisions. Nextgen Operational Concepts Are Beginning To Emerge To Meet The Projected Air Traffic Service Demands. It Will Be Vital To Retain And Even Improve Upon These Proactive Safety Layers For Nextgen. Limited Research To Date Has Been Conducted On Concepts And Issues Associated With Cd&R In A Nextgen Environment, Particularly In The Terminal Maneuvering Area (Tma) And On The Surface. Research To Date Indicates That The Use Of Tcas May Work For Envisioned Trajectory-Based 4-D Operations, But The Suitability Of Tcas Degrades In Operations Nearing The Airport For Operational Concepts Like Those Most Likely To Emerge For Nextgen. Research For Cd&R In A 4-D Surface Operations Environment Is In Its Infancy. Another Important Consideration Is That The 4-D Terminal Area Operations Concepts Proposed For Nextgen Are Being Built Upon Present-Day Operations That Are Already Problematic. The National Transportation Safety Board Continues To Include Improving Runway Safety On Its Most Wanted List Of Transportation Safety Improvements For Aviation [Http://Ntsb.Gov/Recs/Mostwanted/Aviation_Issues.Htm]. In The Four Year Period Between 2003 And 2006, 1,306 Runway Incursion Events Were Reported, Which Is A Rate Of Almost 1 Runway Incursion Event Per Day. The Present-Day Statistics And Events Are Cause Enough For Alarm But, Without Proactive Counter-Measures, The Increase In Air Traffic Forecasted Under Nextgen And Using Novel 4-D Operating Concepts Could Potentially Result In Catastrophic Increases In Runway And Taxiway Incursion Accidents. Objective: The Objective Of This Task Is To Identify An
- Nasa Langley Research Center
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- $355,068.19
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- NNL12AC67T
- Other Functions - Flight Critical Systems Research (Fcsr) Statement Of Work (Sow) Task Title: Assessing Verification And Validation Processes For Automation With Respect To Vulnerabilities To Loss Of Airplane State Awareness 1.0 Background Nasa's Aviation Safety Program Is Conducting Research Directed At Proactively Identifying, Developing, And Maturing Tools, Methods, And Technologies For Improving The Overall Safety Of New And Legacy Aircraft. Research Is Organized Into Three Project Areas: (1) System-Wide Safety And Assurance Technologies (Ssat), (2) Vehicle Systems Safety Technologies (Vsst), And (3) Atmospheric Environment Safety Technologies (Aest). This Sow Specifically Addresses Long-Term Technical Challenges In Both The Ssat And Vsst Projects. Ssat, Assurance Of Flight Critical Systems Development Of Verification And Validation (V&V) Techniques To Establish Confidence That New Technologies Are Safe And Provide A Cost-Effective Basis For Assurance And Certification Of Complex Civil Aviation Systems. Ssat, Assuring Safe Human-Systems Integration Enable The Development Of Robust Human-Automation Systems By Incorporating Known Limitations Of Human Performance Into Analysis Tools. Vsst, Improved Crew Decision Making And Response In Complex Situations Demonstrate Capabilities That Enable Pilots To Better Understand And Respond Safely To Complex Situations. Vsst, Safe And Effective Aircraft Control Under Hazardous Conditions Develop Integrated Guidance, Control, And System Technologies That Enable Safe And Effective Crew/System Aircraft Control Under Hazardous Conditions. More Specifically, Within The Assurance Of Flight Critical Systems Challenge Of Ssat, There Is A Sub-Challenge Related To The Verification And Validation Of Authority And Autonomy (A&A) Constructs. Authority, In The Context Of Aircraft Operations, Refers To Having The Right, Or Power, To Exercise Controls That Will Change The Position, Velocity, And/Or Attitude Of An Aircraft. Autonomy Refers To A Function Or System That Can Operate Independently Of Pilot Or Controller Intervention. For Current Aircraft Operations, Pilots And Air Traffic Controllers Are The Authorities However, They May, And Do, Delegate Authority To Automation For Selected Activities Or Functions (E.G., Auto-Land Systems). In These Cases, The Pilot And/Or Air Traffic Controller Is Responsible For Monitoring The Performance Of The Automation To Assure It Performs Its Intended Function, And To Reclaim Authority Should It Fail, Or Otherwise De-Couple Per Its Design Logic. This Paradigm Has Worked Well And Has Been Demonstrated To Be Safe For Many Situations Due Largely To Established V&V Processes For Systems And Procedures, As Well As Training. However, There Remain Situations That These Processes Cannot Account For, Or Predict. The Purpose Of The Research That This Sow Contributes To Is To Study One Class Of Such Situations Those Involving Loss Of Airplane State Awareness By The Flight Crew And Air Traffic Controllers. 2.0 Scope / Objective: The Scope Of This Effort Is To Examine Methods For Assessing Whether, And How, Operational Constructs Properly Assign Authority And Autonomy In A Safe And Coordinated Manner With Particular Emphasis On Assuring Adequate Airplane State Awareness By The Flight Crew And Air Traffic Controllers In Off-Nominal And/Or Complex Situations. One Outcome Should Be Recommendations For Improving Design Standards And V&V Techniques To Ensure That There Is Transparency Of Both Authority Transition Mechanics (E.G., Mode Transitions And De-Coupling), And Their Consequences. The Objective Of This Task Is To Deliver A Final Report That Documents The Following: (1) Current Processes Used By The Industry To Conduct V&V Activities To Assure That Airplane State Awareness Is Maintained In Cases Where Automated Systems Have Been Delegated The Authority To Change Airplane State (2) Results Of An Analyses Of T
- 4 Feb 2021
- Other Functions - Flight Critical Systems Research (Fcsr) Statement Of Work (Sow) Task Title: Assessing Verification And Validation Processes For Automation With Respect To Vulnerabilities To Loss Of Airplane State Awareness 1.0 Background Nasa's Aviation Safety Program Is Conducting Research Directed At Proactively Identifying, Developing, And Maturing Tools, Methods, And Technologies For Improving The Overall Safety Of New And Legacy Aircraft. Research Is Organized Into Three Project Areas: (1) System-Wide Safety And Assurance Technologies (Ssat), (2) Vehicle Systems Safety Technologies (Vsst), And (3) Atmospheric Environment Safety Technologies (Aest). This Sow Specifically Addresses Long-Term Technical Challenges In Both The Ssat And Vsst Projects. Ssat, Assurance Of Flight Critical Systems Development Of Verification And Validation (V&V) Techniques To Establish Confidence That New Technologies Are Safe And Provide A Cost-Effective Basis For Assurance And Certification Of Complex Civil Aviation Systems. Ssat, Assuring Safe Human-Systems Integration Enable The Development Of Robust Human-Automation Systems By Incorporating Known Limitations Of Human Performance Into Analysis Tools. Vsst, Improved Crew Decision Making And Response In Complex Situations Demonstrate Capabilities That Enable Pilots To Better Understand And Respond Safely To Complex Situations. Vsst, Safe And Effective Aircraft Control Under Hazardous Conditions Develop Integrated Guidance, Control, And System Technologies That Enable Safe And Effective Crew/System Aircraft Control Under Hazardous Conditions. More Specifically, Within The Assurance Of Flight Critical Systems Challenge Of Ssat, There Is A Sub-Challenge Related To The Verification And Validation Of Authority And Autonomy (A&A) Constructs. Authority, In The Context Of Aircraft Operations, Refers To Having The Right, Or Power, To Exercise Controls That Will Change The Position, Velocity, And/Or Attitude Of An Aircraft. Autonomy Refers To A Function Or System That Can Operate Independently Of Pilot Or Controller Intervention. For Current Aircraft Operations, Pilots And Air Traffic Controllers Are The Authorities However, They May, And Do, Delegate Authority To Automation For Selected Activities Or Functions (E.G., Auto-Land Systems). In These Cases, The Pilot And/Or Air Traffic Controller Is Responsible For Monitoring The Performance Of The Automation To Assure It Performs Its Intended Function, And To Reclaim Authority Should It Fail, Or Otherwise De-Couple Per Its Design Logic. This Paradigm Has Worked Well And Has Been Demonstrated To Be Safe For Many Situations Due Largely To Established V&V Processes For Systems And Procedures, As Well As Training. However, There Remain Situations That These Processes Cannot Account For, Or Predict. The Purpose Of The Research That This Sow Contributes To Is To Study One Class Of Such Situations Those Involving Loss Of Airplane State Awareness By The Flight Crew And Air Traffic Controllers. 2.0 Scope / Objective: The Scope Of This Effort Is To Examine Methods For Assessing Whether, And How, Operational Constructs Properly Assign Authority And Autonomy In A Safe And Coordinated Manner With Particular Emphasis On Assuring Adequate Airplane State Awareness By The Flight Crew And Air Traffic Controllers In Off-Nominal And/Or Complex Situations. One Outcome Should Be Recommendations For Improving Design Standards And V&V Techniques To Ensure That There Is Transparency Of Both Authority Transition Mechanics (E.G., Mode Transitions And De-Coupling), And Their Consequences. The Objective Of This Task Is To Deliver A Final Report That Documents The Following: (1) Current Processes Used By The Industry To Conduct V&V Activities To Assure That Airplane State Awareness Is Maintained In Cases Where Automated Systems Have Been Delegated The Authority To Change Airplane State (2) Results Of An Analyses Of T
- Nasa Langley Research Center
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- $393,395.43
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- INN10PC20048
- Research And Development Baa 09-31
- 18 Oct 2021
- Research And Development Baa 09-31
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $3,420,317.98
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- W911QY18D0187
- Analysis And Support
- 30 Nov 2021
- Analysis And Support
- W6qk Acc-Apg Natick
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $0.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- DTFACT10D00016
- Local Area Augmentation System (Laas) Category Iii (Cat Iii) Avionics; Support From Avionics Manufacturer To Implement The Use Of Additional Messages And Algorithms As Described In Rtca Do-246D And Do-253C In A Commercial Platform.
- 13 Mar 2018
- Local Area Augmentation System (Laas) Category Iii (Cat Iii) Avionics; Support From Avionics Manufacturer To Implement The Use Of Additional Messages And Algorithms As Described In Rtca Do-246D And Do-253C In A Commercial Platform.
- 692L79 Dot Faa Technical Center
- Department Of Transportation (Dot)
- $0.00
- Department Of Transportation (Dot)
- W912HQ12C0070
- Ew-1263
- 17 Mar 2023
- Ew-1263
- Us Army Humphreys Engineer Ctr Spt
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $1,051,894.63
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- INN10PC20048
- Research And Development Baa 09-31
- 7 Sep 2021
- Research And Development Baa 09-31
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $3,420,317.98
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- INN10PC20002
- Geospatial Location Accountability And Navigation System For Emergency Responders (Glanser)
- 8 Sep 2021
- Geospatial Location Accountability And Navigation System For Emergency Responders (Glanser)
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $4,469,095.85
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- INN10PC20002
- Geospatial Location Accountability And Navigation System For Emergency Responders (Glanser)
- 18 Aug 2022
- Geospatial Location Accountability And Navigation System For Emergency Responders (Glanser)
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $4,454,719.68
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- W911S723P0044
- Honeywell Maint. - Base
- 26 Sep 2023
- Honeywell Maint. - Base
- W6qm Micc-Ft Leonard Wood
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $25,986.91
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- 692M1519C00006
- Update Pop
- 30 Jun 2021
- Update Pop
- 692M15 Acquisition & Grants, Aaq600
- Department Of Transportation (Dot)
- $782,857.00
- Department Of Transportation (Dot)
- NNL17AA31T
- Nra (National Aeronautics And Space Administration Research Announcement) Enhancing Airplane State Awareness For Current And Future Operations Within Nasas Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (Armd), The Technologies For Airplane State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project Of The Airspace Technologies Demonstration (Atd) Project In The Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Isrp) Has The Responsibility To Explore And Develop New Solution Concepts That Can Reduce The Likelihood Of Loss Of Airplane State Awareness By Flight Crews. The Tasa Sub-Project Is A Five-Year Activity With Several Lines Of Investigation Underway Or Planned (Fy15-Fy19). The Contracted Effort Described Here Contributes To One Of These Lines Of Investigation. Accident And Incident Rates For Commercial Aviation Continue To Be At Or Near Their Lowest Levels In History And Are Far Better Than Other Modes Of Transportation. These Low Rates Can Be Attributed In Part To Advances In The Performance And Reliability Of Aircraft And Their Associated Onboard Systems. However, Recent Studies By The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) And The Federal Aviation Administration (Faa), As Well As Recent Events, Indicate A Concerning Trend. This Trend Involves The Effect Of Growing System Complexity On Flight Crew Understanding Of The State Of Systems, Subsystems, And Interdependencies, Particularly In Sometimes Rapidly-Changing Situations. Often, These Effects Are Described Using Abstract Terms Such As Loss Of Flight Crew Situation Awareness, Loss Of Automation Mode Awareness, And Automation Mode Confusion. Post-Hoc Comments From Pilots Will Mention Surprises Where The Systems Behaved In Ways The Flight Crew Did Not Expect, Followed By Comments Such As Why Did It Do That, What Is It Doing Now And What Will It Do Next. As Pilots Have The Final Authority And Responsibility For Assuring Safety-Of-Flight, An Effective Design Should Provide For Manageable Workload, Comprehensible Systems, And Appropriate Forms Of Intervention, Especially In Off-Nominal Situations. Despite This Trend, Recent Years Have Seen A Tremendous Increase In The Prevalence And Use Of Information Automation (I.E., Decision Support Functions). Similarly, Current Plans For Modernization Call For An Ever-Greater Reliance On Information Technology And Autonomous Functions. Thus, It May Become Even More Difficult For Pilots To Maintain Awareness And To Understand What The Systems Are Doing, What They Are Intended To Do, And What They Are Not Intended To Do. Further Exacerbating The Problem Is The Fact That Aircraft Systems Are Designed To Be Very Reliable And Pilots Have Grown To Trust Them, And In Nearly All Cases This Trust Is Warranted. However, Because Humans Are Typically Not Good At Monitoring For Rare Events, And It Is Indeed The Rare Event That Triggers Unexpected System Behavior (E.G., Autopilot Disconnect) Due To Failures, The Crew May End Up In A Difficult, Untrained, Incomprehensible Situation. This Statement Of Work Is The Result Of A Proposal Submitted By Honeywell, Inc., For Award Under The Nasa Headquarters Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (Armd) Nasa Research Announcement (Nra) Entitled Research Opportunities In Aeronautics 2015, Amendment Nnh15zea001n, Subtopic 2.2.
- 10 Jan 2020
- Nra (National Aeronautics And Space Administration Research Announcement) Enhancing Airplane State Awareness For Current And Future Operations Within Nasas Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (Armd), The Technologies For Airplane State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project Of The Airspace Technologies Demonstration (Atd) Project In The Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Isrp) Has The Responsibility To Explore And Develop New Solution Concepts That Can Reduce The Likelihood Of Loss Of Airplane State Awareness By Flight Crews. The Tasa Sub-Project Is A Five-Year Activity With Several Lines Of Investigation Underway Or Planned (Fy15-Fy19). The Contracted Effort Described Here Contributes To One Of These Lines Of Investigation. Accident And Incident Rates For Commercial Aviation Continue To Be At Or Near Their Lowest Levels In History And Are Far Better Than Other Modes Of Transportation. These Low Rates Can Be Attributed In Part To Advances In The Performance And Reliability Of Aircraft And Their Associated Onboard Systems. However, Recent Studies By The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) And The Federal Aviation Administration (Faa), As Well As Recent Events, Indicate A Concerning Trend. This Trend Involves The Effect Of Growing System Complexity On Flight Crew Understanding Of The State Of Systems, Subsystems, And Interdependencies, Particularly In Sometimes Rapidly-Changing Situations. Often, These Effects Are Described Using Abstract Terms Such As Loss Of Flight Crew Situation Awareness, Loss Of Automation Mode Awareness, And Automation Mode Confusion. Post-Hoc Comments From Pilots Will Mention Surprises Where The Systems Behaved In Ways The Flight Crew Did Not Expect, Followed By Comments Such As Why Did It Do That, What Is It Doing Now And What Will It Do Next. As Pilots Have The Final Authority And Responsibility For Assuring Safety-Of-Flight, An Effective Design Should Provide For Manageable Workload, Comprehensible Systems, And Appropriate Forms Of Intervention, Especially In Off-Nominal Situations. Despite This Trend, Recent Years Have Seen A Tremendous Increase In The Prevalence And Use Of Information Automation (I.E., Decision Support Functions). Similarly, Current Plans For Modernization Call For An Ever-Greater Reliance On Information Technology And Autonomous Functions. Thus, It May Become Even More Difficult For Pilots To Maintain Awareness And To Understand What The Systems Are Doing, What They Are Intended To Do, And What They Are Not Intended To Do. Further Exacerbating The Problem Is The Fact That Aircraft Systems Are Designed To Be Very Reliable And Pilots Have Grown To Trust Them, And In Nearly All Cases This Trust Is Warranted. However, Because Humans Are Typically Not Good At Monitoring For Rare Events, And It Is Indeed The Rare Event That Triggers Unexpected System Behavior (E.G., Autopilot Disconnect) Due To Failures, The Crew May End Up In A Difficult, Untrained, Incomprehensible Situation. This Statement Of Work Is The Result Of A Proposal Submitted By Honeywell, Inc., For Award Under The Nasa Headquarters Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (Armd) Nasa Research Announcement (Nra) Entitled Research Opportunities In Aeronautics 2015, Amendment Nnh15zea001n, Subtopic 2.2.
- Nasa Langley Research Center
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- $1,499,979.00
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- NNL15AC08T
- Task Order Entitled "Spatial Disorientation Mitigation: Existing And New Methods". In December 2014, As A Result Of Analyzing 18 Loss-Of-Control Events, The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) Recommended Research Into Flight Deck Technologies That Have Potential To Mitigate The Problems And Contributing Factors That Lead To Flight Crew Loss Of Airplane State Awareness (Asa) And Conditions Likely To Produce Spatial Disorientation. The Aviation Community (Government, Industry And Academia) Have Been Charged With Conducting Research In The Following Areas: 1. Assess The Relative Benefits Associated With Various Methods Of Displaying Angle-Of-Attack On The Flight Deck. 2. Develop And Refine Algorithms And Display Strategies To Provide Control Guidance For Recovery From Approach-To-Stall Or Stall. 3. Develop And Refine Systems That Predict The Future Aircraft Energy State And/Or Autoflight Configuration If The Current Course Of Action Is Continued And Provide Appropriate Ing. 4. Cost-Effective, User-Centered Flight Deck Ing Systems To Flight Crews Especially For The Two Conditions That Produced Spatial Disorientation In The Asa Event Data Set (Sub-Threshold Rolls And The Somatogravic Illusion). They Suggest This Research Should Raise The Technology Readiness Level (Trl) Of These Features To A Level That Enables Cost-Effective Implementation And Certification Of These Technologies. This Work Supports The Nasa Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Aosp), Air Traffic Management (Atm) Technology Demonstrations (Atd) Project, Technologies For Aircraft State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project In Support Of Cast's Safety Enhancement #207, Outcome #4.
- 10 Aug 2021
- Task Order Entitled "Spatial Disorientation Mitigation: Existing And New Methods". In December 2014, As A Result Of Analyzing 18 Loss-Of-Control Events, The Commercial Aviation Safety Team (Cast) Recommended Research Into Flight Deck Technologies That Have Potential To Mitigate The Problems And Contributing Factors That Lead To Flight Crew Loss Of Airplane State Awareness (Asa) And Conditions Likely To Produce Spatial Disorientation. The Aviation Community (Government, Industry And Academia) Have Been Charged With Conducting Research In The Following Areas: 1. Assess The Relative Benefits Associated With Various Methods Of Displaying Angle-Of-Attack On The Flight Deck. 2. Develop And Refine Algorithms And Display Strategies To Provide Control Guidance For Recovery From Approach-To-Stall Or Stall. 3. Develop And Refine Systems That Predict The Future Aircraft Energy State And/Or Autoflight Configuration If The Current Course Of Action Is Continued And Provide Appropriate Ing. 4. Cost-Effective, User-Centered Flight Deck Ing Systems To Flight Crews Especially For The Two Conditions That Produced Spatial Disorientation In The Asa Event Data Set (Sub-Threshold Rolls And The Somatogravic Illusion). They Suggest This Research Should Raise The Technology Readiness Level (Trl) Of These Features To A Level That Enables Cost-Effective Implementation And Certification Of These Technologies. This Work Supports The Nasa Airspace Operations And Safety Program (Aosp), Air Traffic Management (Atm) Technology Demonstrations (Atd) Project, Technologies For Aircraft State Awareness (Tasa) Sub-Project In Support Of Cast's Safety Enhancement #207, Outcome #4.
- Nasa Marshall Space Flight Center
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- $233,244.85
- National Aeronautics And Space Administration (Nasa)
- IND15PC00077
- Tto. Enhanced 360 Degree Situational Awareness With Virtual Windows.
- 23 Sep 2021
- Tto. Enhanced 360 Degree Situational Awareness With Virtual Windows.
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $3,714,704.19
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- W911QY22F0050
- Research And Development
- 24 Aug 2022
- Research And Development
- W6qk Acc-Apg Natick
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- $91,943.00
- Department Of Defense (Dod)
- IND15PC00077
- Tto. Enhanced 360 Degree Situational Awareness With Virtual Windows.
- 8 Sep 2022
- Tto. Enhanced 360 Degree Situational Awareness With Virtual Windows.
- Ibc Acq Svcs Directorate (00004)
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
- $3,697,139.23
- Department Of The Interior (Doi)
Supply Items Approved for CAGE 27327 Page 1 of 1
- M604CY42Z
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- 1995994-4
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- AV72
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- MC8196-01
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28104307
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- H478F
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 2
- 11502087-1
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 1 | DAC: 6
- 84467
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- BD142DR, 1A,2C,5A,6A
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- NGCMA10AX01M
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- CT410B
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
- VP501A
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 233060-7
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 1265-4
- RNCC: C | RNVC: 1 | DAC: 4
- 28103444
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 2
- 3439030
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 1 | DAC: 6
- 28009608
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28104865
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28107536
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28104866-001
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 1
- 28109802
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28104438
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28110015
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28110016
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 280099609
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28103442
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28103441
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010048
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010047
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010046
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010040
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010029
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010012
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010005
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28009999
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010006
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28009906
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 28010051
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 2
- 1995993-3
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- R7290A1001-1
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- UG1094U
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
- 28104306
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- 1995987-4
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- 914CE1-6L1
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
- MC8226-01
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 1
- 60-155PC155A1
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 1
- 1015Z930
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 233075PC3
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- M0DELHS3Z
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- 2111-10K
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- GLEB01A1B
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- 060-4256-02TJG
- RNCC: C | RNVC: 1 | DAC: 3
- AP121DT,1A,2C,5A,6A
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 5
- GLEB-24A2B
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: B
- 89616
- RNCC: 5 | RNVC: 1 | DAC: 6
- 89616-26
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 6
- 3106-145-19
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- 3106-145-20
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- 2455RC-9100-373
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
- 87941
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 4
- MLH010BGD14B
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
- 2455RC
- RNCC: 3 | RNVC: 2 | DAC: 3
